linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add clock-frequency to MDIO node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65b9b056.050a0220.2fde8.9be5@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:28:34 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add
 clock-frequency to MDIO node

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 05:40:41PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:57:36 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > If we merge this via netdev, is a merge conflict likely? Any other
> > > changes expected in this area, given the changes which might happen to
> > > GCC soon, etc?
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > 
> > Honestly I don't expect much to change here in the mdio node.
> > 
> > If it's a problem I can submit in a separate patch in linux-msm.
> 
> The arch maintainers usually prefer to take the DTS patches,
> so if there isn't anything special here we should probably
> default to that.

Thanks for the suggestion I sent v3 with the DTS patch dropped and I
sent that patch separately.

-- 
	Ansuel