| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240131-flsplit-v3-4-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:01:45 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>, David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/47] filelock: add some new helper functions
In later patches we're going to embed some common fields into a new
structure inside struct file_lock. Smooth the transition by adding some
new helper functions, and converting the core file locking code to use
them.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
fs/locks.c | 18 +++++++++---------
include/linux/filelock.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 1eceaa56e47f..149070fd3b66 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static void __locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker)
if (waiter->fl_lmops && waiter->fl_lmops->lm_notify)
waiter->fl_lmops->lm_notify(waiter);
else
- wake_up(&waiter->fl_wait);
+ locks_wake_up(waiter);
/*
* The setting of fl_blocker to NULL marks the "done"
@@ -841,9 +841,9 @@ locks_delete_lock_ctx(struct file_lock *fl, struct list_head *dispose)
static bool locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
struct file_lock *sys_fl)
{
- if (sys_fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK)
+ if (lock_is_write(sys_fl))
return true;
- if (caller_fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK)
+ if (lock_is_write(caller_fl))
return true;
return false;
}
@@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ static bool posix_test_locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
struct file_lock *sys_fl)
{
/* F_UNLCK checks any locks on the same fd. */
- if (caller_fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
+ if (lock_is_unlock(caller_fl)) {
if (!posix_same_owner(caller_fl, sys_fl))
return false;
return locks_overlap(caller_fl, sys_fl);
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int flock_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request)
break;
}
- if (request->fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
+ if (lock_is_unlock(request)) {
if ((request->fl_flags & FL_EXISTS) && !found)
error = -ENOENT;
goto out;
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
ctx = locks_get_lock_context(inode, request->fl_type);
if (!ctx)
- return (request->fl_type == F_UNLCK) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+ return lock_is_unlock(request) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
/*
* We may need two file_lock structures for this operation,
@@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
continue;
if (fl->fl_start > request->fl_end)
break;
- if (request->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
+ if (lock_is_unlock(request))
added = true;
if (fl->fl_start < request->fl_start)
left = fl;
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
error = 0;
if (!added) {
- if (request->fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
+ if (lock_is_unlock(request)) {
if (request->fl_flags & FL_EXISTS)
error = -ENOENT;
goto out;
@@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ void lease_get_mtime(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *time)
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
fl = list_first_entry_or_null(&ctx->flc_lease,
struct file_lock, fl_list);
- if (fl && (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK))
+ if (fl && lock_is_write(fl))
has_lease = true;
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
index 085ff6ba0653..a814664b1053 100644
--- a/include/linux/filelock.h
+++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
@@ -147,6 +147,29 @@ int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, int arg);
int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
+static inline bool lock_is_unlock(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+ return fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK;
+}
+
+static inline bool lock_is_read(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+ return fl->fl_type == F_RDLCK;
+}
+
+static inline bool lock_is_write(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+ return fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK;
+}
+
+static inline void locks_wake_up(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+ wake_up(&fl->fl_wait);
+}
+
+/* for walking lists of file_locks linked by fl_list */
+#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head) list_for_each_entry(_fl, _head, fl_list)
+
/* fs/locks.c */
void locks_free_lock_context(struct inode *inode);
void locks_free_lock(struct file_lock *fl);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists