[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240131-flsplit-v3-20-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:02:01 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>, David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 20/47] filelock: make posix_same_owner take
file_lock_core pointers
Change posix_same_owner to take struct file_lock_core pointers, and
convert the callers to pass those in.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
fs/locks.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 5d25a3f53c9d..9ff331b55b7a 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -590,9 +590,9 @@ static inline int locks_overlap(struct file_lock *fl1, struct file_lock *fl2)
/*
* Check whether two locks have the same owner.
*/
-static int posix_same_owner(struct file_lock *fl1, struct file_lock *fl2)
+static int posix_same_owner(struct file_lock_core *fl1, struct file_lock_core *fl2)
{
- return fl1->c.flc_owner == fl2->c.flc_owner;
+ return fl1->flc_owner == fl2->flc_owner;
}
/* Must be called with the flc_lock held! */
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static bool posix_locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
/* POSIX locks owned by the same process do not conflict with
* each other.
*/
- if (posix_same_owner(caller_fl, sys_fl))
+ if (posix_same_owner(&caller_fl->c, &sys_fl->c))
return false;
/* Check whether they overlap */
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static bool posix_test_locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
{
/* F_UNLCK checks any locks on the same fd. */
if (lock_is_unlock(caller_fl)) {
- if (!posix_same_owner(caller_fl, sys_fl))
+ if (!posix_same_owner(&caller_fl->c, &sys_fl->c))
return false;
return locks_overlap(caller_fl, sys_fl);
}
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static struct file_lock *what_owner_is_waiting_for(struct file_lock *block_fl)
struct file_lock *fl;
hash_for_each_possible(blocked_hash, fl, c.flc_link, posix_owner_key(block_fl)) {
- if (posix_same_owner(fl, block_fl)) {
+ if (posix_same_owner(&fl->c, &block_fl->c)) {
while (fl->c.flc_blocker)
fl = fl->c.flc_blocker;
return fl;
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
while ((block_fl = what_owner_is_waiting_for(block_fl))) {
if (i++ > MAX_DEADLK_ITERATIONS)
return 0;
- if (posix_same_owner(caller_fl, block_fl))
+ if (posix_same_owner(&caller_fl->c, &block_fl->c))
return 1;
}
return 0;
@@ -1178,13 +1178,13 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
/* Find the first old lock with the same owner as the new lock */
list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_posix, c.flc_list) {
- if (posix_same_owner(request, fl))
+ if (posix_same_owner(&request->c, &fl->c))
break;
}
/* Process locks with this owner. */
list_for_each_entry_safe_from(fl, tmp, &ctx->flc_posix, c.flc_list) {
- if (!posix_same_owner(request, fl))
+ if (!posix_same_owner(&request->c, &fl->c))
break;
/* Detect adjacent or overlapping regions (if same lock type) */
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists