linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 23:22:49 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, "wg@...ndegger.com"
	<wg@...ndegger.com>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com"
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible
 string

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible
> string
> 
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:00:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95
> > > compatible string
> > >
> > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:26:25 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > > > Add i.MX95 flexcan which is compatible i.MX93 flexcan
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> > >
> > > Hm, you don't apply CAN DTB patches?
> >
> > Nope. I am preparing dt-binding first, then post the i.MX95 SoC dtsi.
> > The CAN will be in the i.MX95 SOC dtsi file, not a single patch only
> > for CAN node.
> 
> The question was why isn't Marc, the CAN maintainer, applying this. I have
> the same question.

That's fine, let's drop this patch, the CAN node will not be put in my soc dtsi
patch file, it will be in a separate patchset with some i.MX95 patches.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Rob