[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878r46ym4b.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:53:40 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: oliver.sang@...el.com, riel@...riel.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com,
willy@...radead.org, cl@...ux.com, ying.huang@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: mmap: map MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE
* Yang Shi:
> From: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
>
> The commit efa7df3e3bb5 ("mm: align larger anonymous mappings on THP
> boundaries") incured regression for stress-ng pthread benchmark [1].
> It is because THP get allocated to pthread's stack area much more possible
> than before. Pthread's stack area is allocated by mmap without VM_GROWSDOWN
> or VM_GROWSUP flag, so kernel can't tell whether it is a stack area or not.
>
> The MAP_STACK flag is used to mark the stack area, but it is a no-op on
> Linux. Mapping MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE to prevent from allocating
> THP for such stack area.
Doesn't this introduce a regression in the other direction, where
workloads expect to use a hugepage TLB entry for the stack?
It's seems an odd approach to fixing the stress-ng regression. Isn't it
very much coding to the benchmark?
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists