linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: rockchip: Pine64 PineTab2 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10956967.nitPUkWRp2@diego>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:03:05 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Dang Huynh <danct12@...eup.net>, Manuel Traut <manut@...ka.net>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
 Mark Yao <markyao0591@...il.com>, Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
 Segfault <awarnecke002@...mail.com>, Arnaud Ferraris <aferraris@...ian.org>,
 Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: rockchip: Pine64 PineTab2 support

Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2024, 20:36:22 CET schrieb Manuel Traut:
> Hi Dang,
> 
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 06:35:50PM +0700, Dang Huynh wrote:
> > Hi Manuel,
> > 
> > Since the BOE patches have been accepted to next, you do not need to include 
> > it in this patch series.
> 
> sorry, I thought patches to LKML shall be against Linux master since the
> patches are still only in drm-next I considered to keep them in the queue.

normally if parts of the v(x-1) version of your series are already
applied somewhere you just mention that fact in the cover-letter
in the changelog, like "dropped display patches already applied to drm-misc"

Just to make sure, there is no need for a resend, I'll look at and pick
just the remaining patches :-)


Heiko