[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALTww29UKCJcvJB2BvGTbCcpvD4Y-J+Bg1WgE0nOijLNMv=RGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:28:59 +0800
From: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: mpatocka@...hat.com, heinzm@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org,
dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, song@...nel.org, jbrassow@....redhat.com,
neilb@...e.de, shli@...com, akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:25 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Xiao Ni!
>
> 在 2024/01/31 8:29, Xiao Ni 写道:
> > In my environment, the lvm2 regression test has passed. There are only
> > three failed cases which also fail in kernel 6.6.
> >
> > ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvresize-fs-crypt.sh
> > ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/pvck-dump.sh
> > ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/select-report.sh
> > ### 426 tests: 346 passed, 70 skipped, 0 timed out, 7 warned, 3 failed
> > in 89:26.073
>
> Thanks for the test, this is greate news.
>
> Kuai
>
Hi Kuai
Have you run mdadm regression tests based on this patch set?
Regards
Xiao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists