lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:34:52 +0800
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, fancer.lancer@...il.com, lkp@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, set_pte_at@...look.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: eeprom/idt_89hpesx: Convert data structures to LE
 explicitly

Hi Greg,

Thanks for reviewing.

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:04:17AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:06:32PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> > For data structures needs cpu_to_le* conversion, its prototype needs to
> > be declared with __le* explicitly.
> > 
> > Fixes: cfad6425382e ("eeprom: Add IDT 89HPESx EEPROM/CSR driver")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401261250.b07Yt30Z-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
> > index d807d08e2614..327afb866b21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
> > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ struct idt_smb_seq {
> >  struct idt_eeprom_seq {
> >  	u8 cmd;
> >  	u8 eeaddr;
> > -	u16 memaddr;
> > +	__le16 memaddr;
> >  	u8 data;
> >  } __packed;
> >  
> > @@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ struct idt_eeprom_seq {
> >   */
> >  struct idt_csr_seq {
> >  	u8 cmd;
> > -	u16 csraddr;
> > -	u32 data;
> > +	__le16 csraddr;
> > +	__le32 data;
> >  } __packed;
> >  
> >  /*
> 
> Declaring them this way is nice, but this doesn't actually "fix"
> anything at all as no code is actually changed.
> 
> So how is ths a bugfix?  How does this patch do anything?
> 
> confused,

Sorry for the confuson.

This commit is to address the issue reported by kernel test rebot[1].

Partially quoted from it:

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:599:31: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr @@     got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:599:31: sparse:     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:599:31: sparse:     got restricted __le16 [usertype]
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:671:31: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr @@     got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:671:31: sparse:     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:671:31: sparse:     got restricted __le16 [usertype]
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:769:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr @@     got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:769:24: sparse:     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:769:24: sparse:     got restricted __le16 [usertype]
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:770:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@     expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] data @@     got restricted __le32 [usertype] @@
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:770:21: sparse:     expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] data
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:770:21: sparse:     got restricted __le32 [usertype]
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:834:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr @@     got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:834:24: sparse:     expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr
   drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:834:24: sparse:     got restricted __le16 [usertype]
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401261250.b07Yt30Z-lkp@intel.com/

Thanks,

    Dawei

> 
> greg k-h
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ