[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a574e6ac-1ac7-4c27-b6eb-58225033262c@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:15:20 -0800
From: Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@...cinc.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <frowand.list@...il.com>,
<vgupta@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>, <olof@...om.net>,
<soc@...nel.org>, <guoren@...nel.org>, <monstr@...str.eu>,
<palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
<chenhuacai@...nel.org>, <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
<jonas@...thpole.se>, <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
<shorne@...il.com>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
<dalias@...c.org>, <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, <richard@....at>,
<anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, <johannes@...solutions.net>,
<chris@...kel.net>, <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/46] sh: reserved_mem: Implement the new processing
order for reserved memory
On 1/31/2024 7:41 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 03:53:53PM -0800, Oreoluwa Babatunde wrote:
>> Call early_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() in place of
>> early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() to carry out the first stage of the
>> reserved memory processing only.
>>
>> The early_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() function is used to scan through the
>> DT and mark all the reserved memory regions as reserved or nomap as
>> needed, as well as allocate the memory required by the
>> dynamically-placed
>> reserved memory regions.
>>
>> The second stage of the reserved memory processing is done by
>> fdt_init_reserved_mem(). This function is used to store the information
>> of the statically-placed reserved memory nodes in the reserved_mem
>> array as well as call the region specific initialization function on all
>> the stored reserved memory regions.
>>
>> The call to fdt_init_reserved_mem() is placed right after
>> early_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() because memblock allocated memory should
>> already be writable at this point.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c
>> index f7f3e618e85b..7bec409f077c 100644
>> --- a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c
>> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/of_clk.h>
>> #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>> #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>> #include <asm/machvec.h>
>> @@ -110,7 +111,8 @@ static int noopi(void)
>> static void __init sh_of_mem_reserve(void)
>> {
>> early_init_fdt_reserve_self();
>> - early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>> + early_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>> + fdt_init_reserved_mem();
> Looking at the sh code, there's an existing problem with the order of
> init. This is called from paging_init() and is done after unflattening
> and copying the DT. That means the kernel could freely allocate memory
> for the DT in a reserved region.
>
> Rob
Hi Rob,
Yes I agree! I can try to restructure the code to address
this. I think we should be able to move the call to
early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() higher in the init
sequence without having any issues.
Will try this out and see.
Regards,
Oreoluwa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists