linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/21] pnp.h: Return -EPROBE_DEFER for disabled IRQ resource in pnp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hHYa4c2U-tegdBtoTak=MirXwyBXbN9yrWPx_x-+yMzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 19:00:51 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, 
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>, 
	Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/21] pnp.h: Return -EPROBE_DEFER for disabled IRQ
 resource in pnp_irq()

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:24 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> To support deferred PNP driver probe, pnp_irq() must return -EPROBE_DEFER
> so that the device driver can do deferred probe if the interrupt controller
> is not probed early.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/pnp.h | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pnp.h b/include/linux/pnp.h
> index c2a7cfbca713..21cf833789fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pnp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pnp.h
> @@ -147,12 +147,18 @@ static inline resource_size_t pnp_mem_len(struct pnp_dev *dev,
>  }
>
>
> -static inline resource_size_t pnp_irq(struct pnp_dev *dev, unsigned int bar)
> +static inline int pnp_irq(struct pnp_dev *dev, unsigned int bar)
>  {
>         struct resource *res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, bar);
>
> -       if (pnp_resource_valid(res))
> +       if (pnp_resource_valid(res)) {
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI)
> +               if (!pnp_resource_enabled(res))
> +                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +#endif

What would be wrong with

if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI) && !pnp_resource_enabled(res))
        return -EPROBE_DEFER;

?

> +
>                 return res->start;
> +       }
>         return -1;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>