[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=MCr8qAbDhREWdVdLMujso7+JNoBozfDWLx5cqoMWhNiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:56:20 -0800
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm/zswap: invalidate zswap entry when swap entry free
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 7:50 AM Chengming Zhou
<zhouchengming@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> During testing I found there are some times the zswap_writeback_entry()
> return -ENOMEM, which is not we expected:
>
> bpftrace -e 'kr:zswap_writeback_entry {@[(int32)retval]=count()}'
> @[-12]: 1563
> @[0]: 277221
>
> The reason is that __read_swap_cache_async() return NULL because
> swapcache_prepare() failed. The reason is that we won't invalidate
> zswap entry when swap entry freed to the per-cpu pool, these zswap
> entries are still on the zswap tree and lru list.
>
> This patch moves the invalidation ahead to when swap entry freed
> to the per-cpu pool, since there is no any benefit to leave trashy
> zswap entry on the tree and lru list.
>
> With this patch:
> bpftrace -e 'kr:zswap_writeback_entry {@[(int32)retval]=count()}'
> @[0]: 259744
Nice!
Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists