linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf tools fixes for v6.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZbwJrkkQbUxw-hyb@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:14:22 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
	Kate Carcia <kcarcia@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sun Haiyong <sunhaiyong@...ngson.cn>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
	Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf tools fixes for v6.8

Em Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:57:00PM -0800, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 12:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> >         Please consider pulling, mostly 'perf test' issues, which in its
> > turn are mostly related to myself having Intel hybrid systems at home.
 
> I started pulling, but there's some truly odd noise in the tag, so you
> clearly have done something wrong.
 
> You need to fix your odd tagging process, they are normally noisy, but
> this is just so far off the norm that I can't overlook the craziness.

You're right, this can be routed instead thru perf-tools-next, for v6.9.

I should've known better and not send the noisy JSON changes at this
point in time.

And the other stuff doesn't affect normal day to day operation, just a
matter of addressiong artifacts in 'perf test' output so can wait.

Namhyung, please check if you agree to have this merged into
perf-tools-next on the way to v6.9.

- Arnaldo