[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240201030828.12515-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:08:28 +0800
From: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
To: dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org
Cc: amadeus@....edu.cn,
andersson@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: separate CPU OPP tables
Hi, Dmitry
> I went on and checked ipq6018.dtsi. It will need to be reworked before
> we can continue with PMIC-less devices.
> Obviously, the PMIC is not a part of the SoC. So please move the
> "qcom,rpm-mp5496-regulators" node to the board files together with the
> cpu-supply properties that reference that regulator.
Thanks a lot for your advice, now things are clearer.
My idea is as follows:
1. Add all frequencies supported by SoCs in ipq6018.dtsi
2. Move cpu-supply and mp5496 nodes to ipq6018-mp5496.dtsi
&CPU0 {
cpu-supply = <&ipq6018_s2>;
};
..
&rpm_requests {
regulators {
rpm-mp5496...
ipq6018_s2...
};
};
> The SoC itself supports all listed frequencies, so it is incorrect to
> split the opp tables from the ipq6018.dtsi. Instead please patch the
> PMIC-less boards in the following way:
> #include "ipq6018.dtsi"
> &cpu_opp_table {
> /* the board doesn't have a PMIC, disable CPU frequencies which
> require higher voltages */
> /delete-node/ opp-1320000000;
> /delete-node/ opp-1440000000;
>};
Thank you but no need. The CPUFreq NVMEM driver will give the CPU
maximum frequency based on the cpu_speed_bin and opp-supported-hw.
Thanks,
Chukun
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists