linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: make locality handling resilient

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <CYU59FJIKIK5.1XY6N8ODCZWYI@suppilovahvero>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 01:51:16 +0200
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com>, "Alexander Steffen"
 <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>, "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "Lino
 Sanfilippo" <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>, "Sasha Levin" <sashal@...nel.org>,
 <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Ross Philipson" <ross.philipson@...cle.com>, "Kanth Ghatraju"
 <kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com>, "Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: make locality handling resilient

On Thu Jan 25, 2024 at 2:01 AM EET, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> > Could you split this up into multiple patches then, so that they can be 
> > discussed separately?
>
> Gladly, but individually none of these fully address the situation.

The total number of scenarios described was exactly zero meaning for us
that a situation does not exist with our current pool of knowledge :-)

I wonder what sort of scenario requires all those changes applied at
once in order to get fixed.

BR, Jarkko