linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] module.h: define __symbol_get_gpl() as a regular __symbol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 06:29:58 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@...il.com>
Cc: mcgrof@...nel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de, mchehab@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] module.h: define __symbol_get_gpl() as a regular
 __symbol_get()

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:02:52PM +0300, Andrew Kanner wrote:
> Prototype for __symbol_get_gpl() was introduced in the initial git
> commit 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2"), but was not used after that.
> 
> In commit 9011e49d54dc ("modules: only allow symbol_get of
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL modules") Christoph Hellwig switched __symbol_get()
> to process GPL symbols only, most likely this is what
> __symbol_get_gpl() was designed to do.
> 
> We might either define __symbol_get_gpl() as __symbol_get() or remove
> it completely as suggested by Mauro Carvalho Chehab.

Just remove it, there is no need to keep unused funtionality around.

Btw, where did the discussion start?  I hope you're not trying to
add new symbol_get users?