linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] crypto: starfive: Add sm3 support for JH8100

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zbsu39gZn2cGrnew@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:40:47 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@...rfivetech.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] crypto: starfive: Add sm3 support for JH8100

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:01:59AM +0000, JiaJie Ho wrote:
>
> I am using ifdef so unused codes wouldn't be compiled into the driver for unsupported variant.
> Is the compiled driver size a concern for such cases? 

The compiler should be eliminating unused code for you.  Is this
not the case?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt