linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:43:17 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:32 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aroorg> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:48 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> > We do NOT serialize all API callbacks. This means that provider callbacks
> > may be called simultaneously and GPIO drivers need to provide their own
> > locking if needed. This is on purpose. First: we only support exclusive
> > GPIO usage[1] so there's no risk of two drivers getting in each other's
> > way over the same GPIO. Second: with this series, we ensure enough
> > consistency to limit the chance of drivers or user-space users crashing
> > the kernel. With additional improvements in handling the flags field in
> > GPIO descriptors there's very little to gain, while bitbanging drivers
> > may care about the increased performance of going lockless.
>
> OK I read this before but didn't understand it, now I understand it.
>
> The series:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> I think you should merge it all soon so we get some time to shake
> it out in linux-next, hopefully any remaining bugs and cleanups
> can be done in-tree.
>
> Excellent work, by the way.
>

Thanks. There are still a few issues here and there, so I'll be
sending a v2 next week.

Bart

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij