[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8a0c361-3dc7-256f-e2f5-359a31b8975d@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 19:02:37 +0800
From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck
<tony.luck@...el.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Naoya
Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Guohanjun
<guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 1/3] x86/mce: remove redundant fixup type
EX_TYPE_COPY
在 2024/1/31 5:09, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:55:46PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>> In commit 034ff37d3407 ("x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function"),
>> rewrited __copy_user_nocache() uses EX_TYPE_UACCESS instead of
>> EX_TYPE_COPY,this change does not broken the MC safe copy for
>> __copy_user_nocache(), but as a result, there's no place for EX_TYPE_COPY
>> to use. Therefore, we remove the definition of EX_TYPE_COPY.
>
> Please use passive voice in your commit message: no "we" or "I", etc,
> and describe your changes in imperative mood.
>
> Also, pls read section "2) Describe your changes" in
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more details.
>
> Also, see section "Changelog" in
> Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst
OK, thanks, Improved in the next release.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> index fe6312045042..787916ec1e12 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> @@ -36,18 +36,17 @@
>> #define EX_TYPE_DEFAULT 1
>> #define EX_TYPE_FAULT 2
>> #define EX_TYPE_UACCESS 3
>> -#define EX_TYPE_COPY 4
>> -#define EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS 5
>> -#define EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE 6
>> -#define EX_TYPE_BPF 7
>> -#define EX_TYPE_WRMSR 8
>> -#define EX_TYPE_RDMSR 9
>> -#define EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE 10 /* reg := -EIO */
>> -#define EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE 11 /* reg := -EIO */
>> -#define EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE 12
>> -#define EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE 13
>> -#define EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE 14
>> -#define EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE 15
>> +#define EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS 4
>> +#define EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE 5
>> +#define EX_TYPE_BPF 6
>> +#define EX_TYPE_WRMSR 7
>> +#define EX_TYPE_RDMSR 8
>> +#define EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE 9 /* reg := -EIO */
>> +#define EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE 10 /* reg := -EIO */
>> +#define EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE 11
>> +#define EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE 12
>> +#define EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE 13
>> +#define EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE 14
>
> You don't need to renumber them - all you need to do is to comment it
> out:
>
> /* unused, was: #define EX_TYPE_COPY 4 */
OK.
Thanks.
Tong.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists