linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] rxrpc: Simplify the allocation of slab caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZbuS3n8DM4QqoUGg@nanopsycho>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:47:26 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, marc.dionne@...istor.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rxrpc: Simplify the allocation of slab caches

Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 11:09:24AM CET, chentao@...inos.cn wrote:
>Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
>to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
>
>Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>

Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>

btw, why don't you bulk these changes into patchsets of 15 patches? Or,
given the low complexicity of the patch, just merge multiple patches
that are changing similar locations togeter.