linux-kernel - Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: mediatek: add MT7988 reset IDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:11:39 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Frank Wunderlich
	<linux@...web.de>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
	<sboyd@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Philipp Zabel
	<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>, Daniel Golle
	<daniel@...rotopia.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: mediatek: add MT7988
 reset IDs

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:40:17PM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Am 19. Januar 2024 18:04:36 MEZ schrieb Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>:
> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:28:30AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> >>
> >> The resets are organized on a per-reset-controller basis, so, the ETHWARP
> >> reset controller's first reset is RST_SWITCH, the second one is RST_something_else,
> >> etc. while the first reset of the INFRA reset controller is PEXTP_MAC_SWRST.
> >> 
> >> That's why ETHWARP has a reset index 0 and INFRA also starts at 0.
> >> I think that the numbering is good as it is, and having one driver start at index 5
> >> while the other starts at index 12 would only overcomplicate registering the resets
> >> in each driver, or waste bytes by making unnecessarily large arrays, for (imo) no
> >> good reason.
> >> 
> >> This is one header, but it should "in theory" be more than one... so we would have
> >> one for each hardware block - but that'd make the reset directory over-crowded, as
> >> other MediaTek SoCs have got even more resets in even more hardware blocks than the
> >> MT7988. That'd be something like ~4 reset headers per SoC (and will increase with
> >> newer ones)...
> >> ...and this is why we have one binding header for resets.
> >
> >That's okay. The commit message leaves me, who clearly isn't a mediatek
> >guy, with no information as to why these are not one contiguous set.
> >IMO being for different reset controllers entirely is fine.
> >
> >> On the topic of leaving space to allow grouping RST0/RST1: -> No. <-
> >> The indices have to start from zero and have to be sequential, with no holes.
> >
> >Agreed.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just a friendly reminder.
> 
> As far as i understood, Patches are fine so far and do not need any rework,right?

I suspect I was asking for a commit message that explains why these
numbers don't continue in sequence. With that,
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

> 
> But i have not seen them picked up yet in linux-next.
> regards Frank

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)