| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240131-async-free-v2-1-525f03e07184@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:17:31 -0800
From: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Brain Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>,
Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: swap: async free swap slot cache entries
We discovered that 1% swap page fault is 100us+ while 50% of
the swap fault is under 20us.
Further investigation show that a large portion of the time
spent in the free_swap_slots() function for the long tail case.
The percpu cache of swap slots is freed in a batch of 64 entries
inside free_swap_slots(). These cache entries are accumulated
from previous page faults, which may not be related to the current
process.
Doing the batch free in the page fault handler causes longer
tail latencies and penalizes the current process.
Move free_swap_slots() outside of the swapin page fault handler into an
async work queue to avoid such long tail latencies.
The batch free of swap slots is typically at 100us level. Such a
short time will not have a significant impact on the CPU accounting.
Notice that the previous swap slot batching behavior already performs
a delayed batch free. It waits for the entries accumulated to 64.
Adding the async scheduling time does not change the original
free timing significantly.
Testing:
Chun-Tse did some benchmark in chromebook, showing that
zram_wait_metrics improve about 15% with 80% and 95% confidence.
I recently ran some experiments on about 1000 Google production
machines. It shows swapin latency drops in the long tail
100us - 500us bucket dramatically.
platform (100-500us) (0-100us)
A 1.12% -> 0.36% 98.47% -> 99.22%
B 0.65% -> 0.15% 98.96% -> 99.46%
C 0.61% -> 0.23% 98.96% -> 99.38%
Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Wei Xu<weixugc@...gle.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao<yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@...gle.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan<surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Brain Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Cc: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>
Cc: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
remove create_work queue
remove another work queue usage
---
Changes in v2:
- Add description of the impact of time changing suggest by Ying.
- Remove create_workqueue() and use schedule_work()
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231221-async-free-v1-1-94b277992cb0@kernel.org
---
include/linux/swap_slots.h | 1 +
mm/swap_slots.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap_slots.h b/include/linux/swap_slots.h
index 15adfb8c813a..67bc8fa30d63 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap_slots.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap_slots.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct swap_slots_cache {
spinlock_t free_lock; /* protects slots_ret, n_ret */
swp_entry_t *slots_ret;
int n_ret;
+ struct work_struct async_free;
};
void disable_swap_slots_cache_lock(void);
diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c
index 0bec1f705f8e..71d344564e55 100644
--- a/mm/swap_slots.c
+++ b/mm/swap_slots.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_slots_cache_mutex);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex);
static void __drain_swap_slots_cache(unsigned int type);
+static void swapcache_async_free_entries(struct work_struct *data);
#define use_swap_slot_cache (swap_slot_cache_active && swap_slot_cache_enabled)
#define SLOTS_CACHE 0x1
@@ -149,6 +150,7 @@ static int alloc_swap_slot_cache(unsigned int cpu)
spin_lock_init(&cache->free_lock);
cache->lock_initialized = true;
}
+ INIT_WORK(&cache->async_free, swapcache_async_free_entries);
cache->nr = 0;
cache->cur = 0;
cache->n_ret = 0;
@@ -269,6 +271,20 @@ static int refill_swap_slots_cache(struct swap_slots_cache *cache)
return cache->nr;
}
+static void swapcache_async_free_entries(struct work_struct *data)
+{
+ struct swap_slots_cache *cache;
+
+ cache = container_of(data, struct swap_slots_cache, async_free);
+ spin_lock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
+ /* Swap slots cache may be deactivated before acquiring lock */
+ if (cache->slots_ret) {
+ swapcache_free_entries(cache->slots_ret, cache->n_ret);
+ cache->n_ret = 0;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
+}
+
void free_swap_slot(swp_entry_t entry)
{
struct swap_slots_cache *cache;
@@ -282,17 +298,14 @@ void free_swap_slot(swp_entry_t entry)
goto direct_free;
}
if (cache->n_ret >= SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE_SIZE) {
- /*
- * Return slots to global pool.
- * The current swap_map value is SWAP_HAS_CACHE.
- * Set it to 0 to indicate it is available for
- * allocation in global pool
- */
- swapcache_free_entries(cache->slots_ret, cache->n_ret);
- cache->n_ret = 0;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
+ schedule_work(&cache->async_free);
+ goto direct_free;
}
cache->slots_ret[cache->n_ret++] = entry;
spin_unlock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
+ if (cache->n_ret >= SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE_SIZE)
+ schedule_work(&cache->async_free);
} else {
direct_free:
swapcache_free_entries(&entry, 1);
---
base-commit: eacce8189e28717da6f44ee492b7404c636ae0de
change-id: 20231216-async-free-bef392015432
Best regards,
--
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists