[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b38ef82-ec2b-4845-9732-15713a0e2a85@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:17:45 -0600
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] x86/boot: Move mem_encrypt= parsing to the
decompressor
On 1/31/24 03:29, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:12:13AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> The reason we need two flags is because there is no default value to
>> use when the command line param is absent.
>
> I think absent means memory encryption disabled like with every other
> option which is not present...
>
>> There is CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT but that one is AMD
>
> ... yes, and I'm thinking that it is time we kill this. I don't think
> anything uses it. It was meant well at the time.
>
> Let's wait for Tom to wake up first, though, as he might have some
> objections...
I don't know if anyone is using the AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT
config option, but I don't have an issue removing it.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thx.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists