[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:44:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
rui.zhang@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com, support.opensource@...semi.com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org, thara.gopinath@...il.com,
niklas.soderlund@...natech.se, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com, d-gole@...com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com, error27@...il.com, heiko@...ech.de,
hdegoede@...hat.com, jernej.skrabec@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/18] thermal: intel: pch_thermal: Migrate to thermal_zone_device_register()
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:10 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 01/02/24 20:51, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:13 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The thermal API has a new thermal_zone_device_register() function which
> >> is deprecating the older thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips() and
> >> thermal_tripless_zone_device_register().
> >>
> >> Migrate to the new thermal zone device registration function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c | 12 ++++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
> >> index b3905e34c507..73d7c2ac7dbc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
> >> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static int intel_pch_thermal_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> {
> >> enum pch_board_ids board_id = id->driver_data;
> >> + struct thermal_zone_device_params tzdp;
> >> struct pch_thermal_device *ptd;
> >> int nr_trips = 0;
> >> u16 trip_temp;
> >> @@ -233,10 +234,13 @@ static int intel_pch_thermal_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >>
> >> nr_trips += pch_wpt_add_acpi_psv_trip(ptd, nr_trips);
> >>
> >> - ptd->tzd = thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(board_names[board_id],
> >> - ptd->trips, nr_trips,
> >> - 0, ptd, &tzd_ops,
> >> - NULL, 0, 0);
> >> + tzdp.tzp.type = board_names[board_id];
> >> + tzdp.tzp.devdata = ptd;
> >> + tzdp.tzp.trips = ptd->trips;
> >> + tzdp.tzp.num_trips = nr_trips;
> >> + tzdp.tzp.ops = &tzd_ops;
> >> +
> >> + ptd->tzd = thermal_zone_device_register(&tzdp);
> >
> > IMV, this should be
> >
> > ptd->tzd = thermal_zone_device_register(board_names[board_id],
> > ptd->trips, nr_trips, &tzd_ops, ptd, NULL);
> >
> > and the tzdp variable is not necessary even.
> >
>
> The whole point of thermal_zone_device_register() taking just one parameter was
> that those older functions were taking a bit too many params, and with the
> introduction of Thermal Zone name we'd be adding even more.
That's fair.
However, as indicated elsewhere, there are at least a few arguments of
the registration function that fit into the argument list: trips[],
num_trips, ops, devdata.
I'd add the name to that list and put the rest (including type) into
the params struct.
> For intel_pch_thermal, things are more or less the same, assignments are done there
> line by line... but for most of the others, IMO it's easier and schematized as a
> single stack-initialized structure that could even be constified in the future.
Well, it's copied into the struct thermal_zone_device, so it's better
to put it one the stack, so the memory occupied by it gets freed when
not needed any more.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists