lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 09:59:30 -0800
From: Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>, Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>, 
	Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, 
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: Add independent control state machine

> Don't touch procfs here.

OK removing procfs changes.


On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 11:18 PM Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>
> Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 07:45:23PM CET, aahila@...gle.com wrote:
> >> Any chance we can have some coverage via self-tests?
> >
> >I plan to work on these self-tests decoupled from the current patch.
> >
> >> Hmm, I wonder how it makes sense to add new features here. This should
> >> rot.
> >
> >Could you clarify what you are suggesting here?
>
> Don't touch procfs here.
>
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:28 AM Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> >>
> >> Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:27:41PM CET, aahila@...gle.com wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>
> >> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> >> >index 43be458422b3..95d88df94756 100644
> >> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> >> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> >> >@@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ static void bond_info_show_master(struct seq_file *seq)
> >> >                          (bond->params.lacp_active) ? "on" : "off");
> >> >               seq_printf(seq, "LACP rate: %s\n",
> >> >                          (bond->params.lacp_fast) ? "fast" : "slow");
> >> >+              seq_printf(seq, "LACP coupled_control: %s\n",
> >> >+                         (bond->params.coupled_control) ? "on" : "off");
> >>
> >> Hmm, I wonder how it makes sense to add new features here. This should
> >> rot.
> >>
> >>
> >> >               seq_printf(seq, "Min links: %d\n", bond->params.min_links);
> >> >               optval = bond_opt_get_val(BOND_OPT_AD_SELECT,
> >> >                                         bond->params.ad_select);
> >>
> >> [...]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ