linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 22:19:15 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, 
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when
 absent

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 01:11:16PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Currently, thermal zones associated with providers that have interrupts
> for signaling hot/critical trips are required to set a polling-delay
> of 0 to indicate no polling. This feels a bit backwards.
> 
> Change the code such that "no polling delay" also means "no polling".
> 
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> index 4d6c22e0ed85..61bbd42aa2cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> @@ -225,14 +225,18 @@ static int thermal_of_monitor_init(struct device_node *np, int *delay, int *pdel
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay-passive", pdelay);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay-passive property\n", np);
> +	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> +		*pdelay = 0;
> +	} else if (ret < 0) {
> +		pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay-passive: %d\n", np, ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay", delay);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay property\n", np);
> +	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> +		*delay = 0;
> +	} else if (ret < 0) {
> +		pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay: %d\n", np, ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>