lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:47:30 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
	rui.zhang@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
	support.opensource@...semi.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
	linux-imx@....com, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
	amitk@...nel.org, thara.gopinath@...il.com,
	niklas.soderlund@...natech.se, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
	hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com, d-gole@...com,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com,
	error27@...il.com, heiko@...ech.de, hdegoede@...hat.com,
	jernej.skrabec@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/18] thermal: Add new structures and
 thermal_zone_device_register()

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 08:24:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:13 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > index 65d8f92a9a0d..7a540b746703 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ struct thermal_cooling_device {
> >                         passive trip point.
> >   * @need_update:       if equals 1, thermal_zone_device_update needs to be invoked.
> >   * @ops:       operations this &thermal_zone_device supports
> > - * @tzp:       thermal zone parameters
> > + * @tzp:               Thermal zone parameters
> > + * @tgp:               Thermal zone governor parameters
> >   * @governor:  pointer to the governor for this thermal zone
> >   * @governor_data:     private pointer for governor data
> >   * @thermal_instances: list of &struct thermal_instance of this thermal zone
> > @@ -184,7 +185,8 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
> >         int prev_high_trip;
> >         atomic_t need_update;
> >         struct thermal_zone_device_ops *ops;
> > -       struct thermal_zone_params *tzp;
> > +       struct thermal_zone_platform_params *tzp;
> > +       struct thermal_governor_params *tgp;
> 
> I agree with doing a split here, but I'm not sure about moving items
> from the arg list to struct thermal_zone_platform_params (as mentioned
> above).
> 
> Also the naming is quite inconsistent.  IMO it would be better to call
> the first pointer "tzpp", rename struct thermal_governor_params to
> struct thermal_zone_governor_params and call the second pointer
> "tzgp".
> 

The names "tzgp" and "tzpp" look almost identical at first glance.
Could we increase the hamming distance somehow?

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ