linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] rxrpc: Simplify the allocation of slab caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:28:47 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, marc.dionne@...istor.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rxrpc: Simplify the allocation of slab caches

Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:46:33AM CET, chentao@...inos.cn wrote:
>On 2024/2/1 20:47, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 11:09:24AM CET, chentao@...inos.cn wrote:
>> > Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
>> > to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> 
>> btw, why don't you bulk these changes into patchsets of 15 patches? Or,
>> given the low complexicity of the patch, just merge multiple patches
>> that are changing similar locations togeter.
>Sorry, I haven't sent a patchset, I'm worried about messing up.
>I'll try to deal with these similar issues in the way you recommended in the
>future, thank you for the reminder.

Also, please fix your email client. It breaks threads.

>-- 
>Thanks,
>  Kunwu
>