linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ctnetlink: support filtering by zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:12:03 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>
Cc: Felix Huettner <felix.huettner@...l.schwarz>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kadlec@...filter.org, fw@...len.de,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
	shuah@...nel.org, luca.czesla@...l.schwarz,
	max.lamprecht@...l.schwarz, Simon Horman <horms@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ctnetlink: support filtering by zone

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:04:35PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 12/22/23 13:01, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:49:16AM +0000, Felix Huettner wrote:
> >> conntrack zones are heavily used by tools like openvswitch to run
> >> multiple virtual "routers" on a single machine. In this context each
> >> conntrack zone matches to a single router, thereby preventing
> >> overlapping IPs from becoming issues.
> >> In these systems it is common to operate on all conntrack entries of a
> >> given zone, e.g. to delete them when a router is deleted. Previously this
> >> required these tools to dump the full conntrack table and filter out the
> >> relevant entries in userspace potentially causing performance issues.
> >>
> >> To do this we reuse the existing CTA_ZONE attribute. This was previous
> >> parsed but not used during dump and flush requests. Now if CTA_ZONE is
> >> set we filter these operations based on the provided zone.
> >> However this means that users that previously passed CTA_ZONE will
> >> experience a difference in functionality.
> >>
> >> Alternatively CTA_FILTER could have been used for the same
> >> functionality. However it is not yet supported during flush requests and
> >> is only available when using AF_INET or AF_INET6.
> > 
> > For the record, this is applied to nf-next.
> 
> Hi, Felix and Pablo.
> 
> I was looking through the code and the following part is bothering me:
> 
>  diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>  index fb0ae15e96df..4e9133f61251 100644
>  --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>  +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>  @@ -1148,6 +1149,10 @@ static int ctnetlink_filter_match(struct nf_conn *ct, void *data)
>          if (filter->family && nf_ct_l3num(ct) != filter->family)
>                  goto ignore_entry;
>  
>  +       if (filter->zone.id != NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_ID &&
>  +           !nf_ct_zone_equal_any(ct, &filter->zone))
>  +               goto ignore_entry;
>  +
>          if (filter->orig_flags) {
>                  tuple = nf_ct_tuple(ct, IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL);
>                  if (!ctnetlink_filter_match_tuple(&filter->orig, tuple,
> 
> If I'm reading that right, the default zone is always flushed, even if the
> user requested to flush a different zone.  I.e. the entry is never ignored
> for a default zone.  Is that correct or am I reading that wrong?
> 
> If my observation is correct, then I don't think this functionality can
> actually be used by applications as it does something unexpected.

This needs a fix, the NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_ID is used as a marker to
indicate if the filtering by zone needs to happen or not.

I'd suggest to add a boolean flag that specifies that zone filtering
is set on.