linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] Revert "kbuild/mkspec: support 'update-bootloader'-based systems"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri,  2 Feb 2024 22:35:19 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Revert "kbuild/mkspec: support 'update-bootloader'-based systems"

This reverts commit 27c3bffd230abd0a598586aed0fe0ba7b61e0e2e.

If this is still needed, we can bring it back.

However, I'd like to understand why 'update-bootloader --remove' is
needed for uninstallation, while 'update-bootloader --add' was not
called during the installation.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
---

 scripts/package/kernel.spec | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/package/kernel.spec b/scripts/package/kernel.spec
index ecedcfc11e73..c1b745967f64 100644
--- a/scripts/package/kernel.spec
+++ b/scripts/package/kernel.spec
@@ -107,11 +107,6 @@ elif [ -x /usr/bin/kernel-install ]; then
 kernel-install remove %{KERNELRELEASE}
 fi
 
-%postun
-if [ -x /sbin/update-bootloader ]; then
-/sbin/update-bootloader --remove %{KERNELRELEASE}
-fi
-
 %files -f %{buildroot}/kernel.list
 %defattr (-, root, root)
 %exclude /kernel.list
-- 
2.40.1