[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240203112526.GGZb4iphr6YR5f5QNf@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 12:25:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Adam Dunlap <acdunlap@...gle.com>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Sidharth Telang <sidtelang@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86: enforce and cleanup RIP-relative accesses in
early boot code
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 11:27:19AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The minimal fix doesn't look that bad IMHO. Note that this version is
> based on your patch that removes
> CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT, and we'd need to see whether
> or not to backport that as well.
Ok, please send it formally so that I can take a look.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists