[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zb69ryhz_mDw9UK4@linux.dev>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 14:26:55 -0800
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Fix GUEST_PRINTF() format warnings in
ARM code
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:46:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Fix a pile of -Wformat warnings in the KVM ARM selftests code, almost all
> of which are benign "long" versus "long long" issues (selftests are 64-bit
> only, and the guest printf code treats "ll" the same as "l"). The code
> itself isn't problematic, but the warnings make it impossible to build ARM
> selftests with -Werror, which does detect real issues from time to time.
>
> Opportunistically have GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG() interpret set_expected,
> which is a bool, as an unsigned decimal value, i.e. have it print '0' or
> '1' instead of '0x0' or '0x1'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
This all looks good to me. Just want to confirm before applying: you're
not planning any other patches that'll go through your tree that depend
on this right?
Figured not since you sent it separately, but just want to be sure.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists