[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d506a467-8af7-dc26-709a-ba49e6c5a3a6@google.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:30:19 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
cc: robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
yosryahmed@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/iova: use named kmem_cache for iova magazines
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> The magazine buffers can take gigabytes of kmem memory, dominating all
> other allocations. For observability purpose create named slab cache so
> the iova magazine memory overhead can be clearly observed.
>
> With this change:
>
> > slabtop -o | head
> Active / Total Objects (% used) : 869731 / 952904 (91.3%)
> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 103411 / 103974 (99.5%)
> Active / Total Caches (% used) : 135 / 211 (64.0%)
> Active / Total Size (% used) : 395389.68K / 411430.20K (96.1%)
> Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.43K / 8.00K
>
> OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
> 244412 244239 99% 1.00K 61103 4 244412K iommu_iova_magazine
> 91636 88343 96% 0.03K 739 124 2956K kmalloc-32
> 75744 74844 98% 0.12K 2367 32 9468K kernfs_node_cache
>
> On this machine it is now clear that magazine use 242M of kmem memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Very impressive!
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists