linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Handle delay slot for extable lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 11:45:13 +0000
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Handle delay slot for extable lookup

On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 11:03, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com> wrote:
>
> Well this is the tricky part of my assumption.
> In `exception_epc()` `__isa_exception_epc()` stuff is only called if we
> are in delay slot.
> It is impossible for a invalid instruction_pointer to be considered as
> "in delay slot" by hardware.

Ok, I guess I'm convinced this is all safe. Not great, and not exactly
giving me the warm fuzzies, but not buggy.

         Linus