[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240204210932.bd112a37dd3c276b046f6b16@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:09:32 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@...inois.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Xin Li <xin@...or.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kprobes: Boost more instructions from
grp2/3/4/5
On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 21:13:00 -0600
Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@...inois.edu> wrote:
> With the instruction decoder, we are now able to decode and recognize
> instructions with opcode extensions. There are more instructions in
> these groups that can be boosted:
>
> Group 2: ROL, ROR, RCL, RCR, SHL/SAL, SHR, SAR
> Group 3: TEST, NOT, NEG, MUL, IMUL, DIV, IDIV
> Group 4: INC, DEC (byte operation)
> Group 5: INC, DEC (word/doubleword/quadword operation)
>
> These instructions are not boosted previously because there are reserved
> opcodes within the groups, e.g., group 2 with ModR/M.nnn == 110 is
> unmapped. As a result, kprobes attached to them requires two int3 traps
> as being non-boostable also prevents jump-optimization.
>
> Some simple tests on QEMU show that after boosting and jump-optimization
> a single kprobe on these instructions with an empty pre-handler runs 10x
> faster (~1000 cycles vs. ~100 cycles).
>
> Since these instructions are mostly ALU operations and do not touch
> special registers like RIP, let's boost them so that we get the
> performance benefit.
>
This looks good to me. And can you check how many instructions in the
vmlinux will be covered by this change typically?
Thank you,
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@...inois.edu>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> index 7a08d6a486c8..530f6d4b34f4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -169,22 +169,33 @@ bool can_boost(struct insn *insn, void *addr)
> case 0x62: /* bound */
> case 0x70 ... 0x7f: /* Conditional jumps */
> case 0x9a: /* Call far */
> - case 0xc0 ... 0xc1: /* Grp2 */
> case 0xcc ... 0xce: /* software exceptions */
> - case 0xd0 ... 0xd3: /* Grp2 */
> case 0xd6: /* (UD) */
> case 0xd8 ... 0xdf: /* ESC */
> case 0xe0 ... 0xe3: /* LOOP*, JCXZ */
> case 0xe8 ... 0xe9: /* near Call, JMP */
> case 0xeb: /* Short JMP */
> case 0xf0 ... 0xf4: /* LOCK/REP, HLT */
> - case 0xf6 ... 0xf7: /* Grp3 */
> - case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */
> /* ... are not boostable */
> return false;
> + case 0xc0 ... 0xc1: /* Grp2 */
> + case 0xd0 ... 0xd3: /* Grp2 */
> + /*
> + * AMD uses nnn == 110 as SHL/SAL, but Intel makes it reserved.
> + */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) != 0b110;
> + case 0xf6 ... 0xf7: /* Grp3 */
> + /* AMD uses nnn == 001 as TEST, but Intel makes it reserved. */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) != 0b001;
> + case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */
> + /* Only INC and DEC are boostable */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b000 ||
> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b001;
> case 0xff: /* Grp5 */
> - /* Only indirect jmp is boostable */
> - return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 4;
> + /* Only INC, DEC, and indirect JMP are boostable */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b000 ||
> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b001 ||
> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b100;
> default:
> return true;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists