[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQUkUvpj+c0r3vZvfn7djQ5kuBej9RE2L7TZwfxg-L7UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 10:00:27 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: George Guo <dongtai.guo@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
George Guo <guodongtai@...inos.cn>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] netlabel: cleanup struct netlbl_lsm_catmap
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 9:35 PM George Guo <dongtai.guo@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: George Guo <guodongtai@...inos.cn>
>
> Simplify the code from macro NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE to u64, and fix
> warning "Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses"
> on "#define NETLBL_CATMAP_BIT (NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE)0x01", which is
> modified to "#define NETLBL_CATMAP_BIT ((u64)0x01)".
>
> Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@...inos.cn>
> ---
> V2:
> Yes, I understand what you are saying.
> Actually, there is a compile warnings on "#define NETLBL_CATMAP_BIT (NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE)0x01"
> which is missing parentheses.
> ---
> include/net/netlabel.h | 7 +++----
> net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This is a much better approach, thank you.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists