[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec44bf32-8b66-40c4-bc62-4deed3702f99@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:41:56 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for
ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:10:04AM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> The test cases for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic were using arbitrary
> alignment of data to iterate through random inputs. ip_fast_csum should
> have the data aligned along (14 + NET_IP_ALIGN) bytes and
> csum_ipv6_magic should have data aligned along 32-bit boundaries.
>
> While this is being changed, fix up the awkward offset code in
> test_csum_ipv6_magic and use a struct instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Fixes: 6f4c45cbcb00 ("kunit: Add tests for csum_ipv6_magic and ip_fast_csum")
So this works on little endian systems. Unfortunately, I still get
[ 18.447037] # test_ip_fast_csum: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:463
[ 18.447037] Expected ( u64)csum_result == ( u64)expected, but
[ 18.447037] ( u64)csum_result == 33754 (0x83da)
[ 18.447037] ( u64)expected == 55939 (0xda83)
[ 18.455565] not ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
[ 18.463570] # test_csum_ipv6_magic: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:487
[ 18.463570] Expected ( u64)csum_result == ( u64)expected, but
[ 18.463570] ( u64)csum_result == 12221 (0x2fbd)
[ 18.463570] ( u64)expected == 37721 (0x9359)
[ 18.470679] not ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
when running the test on big endian systems such as hppa/parisc or sparc.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists