linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in nfsd_drc_slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09185acc-85f5-4cd3-a268-b6497e340cd9@kylinos.cn>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 11:19:00 +0800
From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
 Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
Cc: chuck.lever@...cle.com, neilb@...e.de, kolga@...app.com,
 Dai.Ngo@...cle.com, tom@...pey.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in
 nfsd_drc_slab_create

Thank you to all the guys who responded to my emails.

On 2024/2/2 22:24, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 09:13 -0500, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
>> On 1 Feb 2024, at 3:19, Kunwu Chan wrote:
>>
>>> Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
>>> to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
>>> Make the code cleaner and more readable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 3 +--
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
>>> index 5c1a4a0aa605..64ce0cc22197 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
>>> @@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ nfsd_reply_cache_free(struct nfsd_drc_bucket *b, struct nfsd_cacherep *rp,
>>>
>>>   int nfsd_drc_slab_create(void)
>>>   {
>>> -	drc_slab = kmem_cache_create("nfsd_drc",
>>> -				sizeof(struct nfsd_cacherep), 0, 0, NULL);
>>> +	drc_slab = KMEM_CACHE(nfsd_cacherep, 0);
>>>   	return drc_slab ? 0: -ENOMEM;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 2.39.2
>>
>> I don't agree that the code is cleaner or more readable like this.  I really
>> dislike having to parse through the extra "simplification" to see what's
>> actually being called and sent.
>>
>> Just my .02 worth.
>>
>> Ben
>>
> 
Everyone has a different opinion. From newcomers like me, a simple code 
is more important than checking all the args of a call function to 
understand what it does.
Too many default arguments can cost us a lot of time that could be spent 
understanding the main logic of the module code, rather than wasting it 
on a single line of calls.

> This will also result in a behavioral change. The "nfsd_drc" string is
> lost with the above macro and (I think) the new name will be
> "nfsd_cacherep". I'm not necessarily opposed to that, as I don't think
> anything depends on the old name, but it should at least be noted in the
> changelog.
Thanks i'll update my v2 patch with a new commit msg to show the name 
change.

> 
-- 
Thanks,
   Kunwu