[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cytavn9x.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:22:50 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: coding-style: Update syntax highlighting
for code-blocks
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com> writes:
> Use c and elisp instead of none in code-blocks
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
> ---
> Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> index c48382c6b477..a75c7044d8b7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
>
> and
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +.. code-block:: c
>
> if (condition)
> do_this();
> @@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ make a good program).
> So, you can either get rid of GNU emacs, or change it to use saner
> values. To do the latter, you can stick the following in your .emacs file:
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +.. code-block:: elisp
Applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists