linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] dt-bindings: watchdog: renesas,wdt: Document RZ/G3S support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d37b87c6-b4d7-43e8-994a-d7bbddbec319@tuxon.dev>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:14:20 +0200
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net, robh@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 p.zabel@...gutronix.de, geert+renesas@...der.be, magnus.damm@...il.com,
 biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>,
 Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] dt-bindings: watchdog: renesas,wdt: Document
 RZ/G3S support



On 02.02.2024 18:40, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 09:58:49AM +0200, Claudiu wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>>
>> Document the support for the watchdog IP available on RZ/G3S SoC. The
>> watchdog IP available on RZ/G3S SoC is identical to the one found on
>> RZ/G2L SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - re-arranged the tags as my b4 am/shazam placed previously the
>>   Ab, Rb tags before the author's Sob
> 
> What's wrong with that?

Nothing, I was just used to do it this way.

> You resent the patch, so I don't think there's any chain of custody
> issues there.
> 
> Cheers,
> Conor.