[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6762ad5-62f2-41d4-bba7-c2d9dcb12498@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:45:53 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] workqueues and printk not playing nice since next-20240130
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:25:15PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (24/02/05 14:07), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > Good point, if it does recur, I could try it on bare metal.
> >
> > Please, me, John, and Sergey know if anyone see this again. I do not
> > feel comfortable when there is problem which might make consoles calm.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Bisection identified this commit:
> > 5797b1c18919 ("workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues")
>
> That commit triggered early boot use-after-free (per kasan) on
> my system, which probably could derail some things.
And enabling KASAN on next-20240130 got me that same KASAN report and
also suppressed the misbehavior, which is not surprising given that
KASAN quarantines free memory for some time. Plus enabling KASAN
on recent -next does not trigger that KASAN report.
So my guess is that we can attribute my oddball test failures to
that use after free. But I will of course continue testing.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists