[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240205183618.7761-3-jesusmgh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:36:20 +0100
From: Jesus Gonzalez <jesusmgh@...il.com>
To: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
jic23@...nel.org,
lars@...afoo.de
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesus Gonzalez <jesusmgh@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] Add 10EC5280 to bmi160_i2c ACPI IDs to allow binding on some devices
"10EC5280" is used by several manufacturers like Lenovo, GPD, or AYA (and
probably others) in their ACPI table as the ID for the bmi160 IMU. This
means the bmi160_i2c driver won't bind to it, and the IMU is unavailable
to the user. Manufacturers have been approached on several occasions to
try getting a BIOS with a fixed ID, mostly without actual positive
results, and since affected devices are already a few years old, this is
not expected to change. This patch enables using the bmi160_i2c driver for
the bmi160 IMU on these devices.
Here is the relevant extract from the DSDT of a GPD Win Max 2 (AMD 6800U
model) with the latest firmware 1.05 installed. GPD sees this as WONTFIX
with the argument of the device working with the Windows drivers.
Scope (_SB.I2CC)
{
Device (BMA2)
{
Name (_ADR, Zero) // _ADR: Address
Name (_HID, "10EC5280") // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_CID, "10EC5280") // _CID: Compatible ID
Name (_DDN, "Accelerometer") // _DDN: DOS Device Name
Name (_UID, One) // _UID: Unique ID
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
{
I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0069, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.I2CC",
0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
)
})
Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.I2CC.BMA2._CRS.RBUF */
}
OperationRegion (CMS2, SystemIO, 0x72, 0x02)
Field (CMS2, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
IND2, 8,
DAT2, 8
}
IndexField (IND2, DAT2, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
Offset (0x74),
BACS, 32
}
Method (ROMS, 0, NotSerialized)
{
Name (RBUF, Package (0x03)
{
"0 -1 0",
"-1 0 0",
"0 0 1"
})
Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.I2CC.BMA2.ROMS.RBUF */
}
Method (CALS, 1, NotSerialized)
{
Local0 = Arg0
If (((Local0 == Zero) || (Local0 == Ones)))
{
Return (Local0)
}
Else
{
BACS = Local0
}
}
Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) // _STA: Status
{
Return (0x0F)
}
}
}
Signed-off-by: Jesus Gonzalez <jesusmgh@...il.com>
---
v2 patch implementing the improvements mentioned by Mr. Cameron and Mr.
Shevchenko, if I understood them correctly. Please tell me if anything
else should be changed, and I'll be happy to make a new revision.
Thank you!
drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_spi.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_spi.c
index 8b573ea99af2..f88d4b2ba79b 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_spi.c
@@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ static const struct spi_device_id bmi160_spi_id[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, bmi160_spi_id);
static const struct acpi_device_id bmi160_acpi_match[] = {
+ /* FIRMWARE BUG WORKAROUND
+ * Some manufacturers like GPD, Lenovo or Aya used the incorrect
+ * ID "10EC5280" for bmi160 in their DSDT. A fixed firmware is not
+ * available as of Feb 2024 after trying to work with OEMs, and
+ * this is not expected to change anymore since at least some of
+ * the affected devices are from 2021/2022.
+ */
+ {"10EC5280", 0},
{"BMI0160", 0},
{ },
};
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists