[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcFFYR-JOrfp7kvn@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:30:25 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] workqueues and printk not playing nice since next-20240130
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 11:41:10AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> [ 0.316453] ==================================================================
> [ 0.317646] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in wq_update_node_max_active+0x123/0x810
> [ 0.318851] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88802109d788 by task swapper/0/0
Ah, that one is fixed by 15930da42f89 ("workqueue: Don't call
cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()"). I have a
hard time imagining that having anything to do with console being quiet tho.
It's a cpumask bit test targeting cpu -1 and the result gets overwritten
later during boot.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists