[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcF1El7fn5xkeoB1@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:53:54 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ieee802154: ca8210: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from
alloc_ordered_workqueue() call
Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound
workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOUND
isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in the
future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
@@ -2857,19 +2857,13 @@ static int ca8210_interrupt_init(struct
*/
static int ca8210_dev_com_init(struct ca8210_priv *priv)
{
- priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
- "MLME work queue",
- WQ_UNBOUND
- );
+ priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("MLME work queue", 0);
if (!priv->mlme_workqueue) {
dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of mlme_workqueue failed!\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
- priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
- "ca8210 irq worker",
- WQ_UNBOUND
- );
+ priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ca8210 irq worker", 0);
if (!priv->irq_workqueue) {
dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of irq_workqueue failed!\n");
destroy_workqueue(priv->mlme_workqueue);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists