linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] printk: Fix LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT when BASE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQU-mpu5GxFSeakOG+xkHGsVD8i4t-y9PnPw_fGT8XgdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:02:03 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, 
	André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, 
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, 
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] printk: Fix LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT when BASE_SMALL
 is enabled

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:30 AM Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr> wrote:
>
> LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT default value depends on BASE_SMALL:
>   config LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT
>         default 12 if !BASE_SMALL
>         default 0 if BASE_SMALL
> But, BASE_SMALL is a config of type int and "!BASE_SMALL" is always
> evaluated to true whatever is the value of BASE_SMALL.
>
> This patch fixes this by using BASE_FULL (type bool) which is equivalent
> to BASE_SMALL==0.
>
> Note: This changes CONFIG_LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT=12 to
> CONFIG_LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT=0 for BASE_SMALL defconfigs, but that will
> not be a big impact due to this code in kernel/printk/printk.c:
>   /* by default this will only continue through for large > 64 CPUs */
>   if (cpu_extra <= __LOG_BUF_LEN / 2)
>           return;
> Systems using CONFIG_BASE_SMALL and having 64+ CPUs should be quite
> rare.
>
> John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de> (printk reviewer) wrote:
> > For printk this will mean that BASE_SMALL systems were probably
> > previously allocating/using the dynamic ringbuffer and now they will
> > just continue to use the static ringbuffer. Which is fine and saves
> > memory (as it should).
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdWm6u1wX7efZQf=2XUAHascps76YQac6rdnQGhc8nop_Q@mail.gmail.com/
> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f6856be8-54b7-0fa0-1d17-39632bf29ada@oracle.com/
> Fixes: 4e244c10eab3 ("kconfig: remove unneeded symbol_empty variable")
> ---
>  init/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada