lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0dc501da580b$1dde1870$599a4950$@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:42:49 +0530
From: "Tamseel Shams" <m.shams@...sung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <linux-fsd@...la.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: fsd: Add fifosize for UART in Device
 Tree



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org]
> Sent: 05 February 2024 13:11
> To: Tamseel Shams <m.shams@...sung.com>; alim.akhtar@...sung.com;
> linux-fsd@...la.com; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; conor+dt@...nel.org;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; jirislaby@...nel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: fsd: Add fifosize for UART in Device Tree
> 
> On 02/02/2024 22:24, Tamseel Shams wrote:
> > UART in FSD SoC has fifosize of 64 bytes.
> > Set fifosize as 64 bytes for UART from Device Tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tamseel Shams <m.shams@...sung.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi | 2 ++
> 
> Please split SoC changes from patches sent to serial, so it will be easy to apply
> for Greg and others.
> 
> Unless you want to say that there is dependency, but there cannot be such -
> it would be a NAK.
> 
Thanks for review. Will take care of this the next version.

Thanks & Regards,
Tamseel Shams


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ