[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcDs/GFkZ881bJR7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 06:13:40 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
"open list:IEEE 802.15.4 SUBSYSTEM" <linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 08/10] net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for
ieee802154
Hello Miquel,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:41:18PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Breno,
>
> Please be more cautious with your titles. It's your second or third
> e-mail with this content without version number. And you also forgot to
> collect Stefan Ack.
Sorry, in fact, the commit you are referring to is already in landed
net-next:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=6aa89bf8ac9a
The problem here is that this commit shouldn't be against net, since it
is already net-next.
This workstream was applied part in net, and part in net-next. I am
trying to focus in fixing all the warning in "net" and not touch those in
net-next. This commit is already in net-next, but, and shouldn't be in
`net`. I will resend the patch without it.
Sorry if this caused any confusion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists