[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240205142229.GA16757@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:22:29 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidfd: change do_notify_pidfd() to use
__wake_up(poll_to_key(EPOLLIN))
Argh, sorry for noise Christian, I have sent the same patch twice.
Please ignore this email, the next email from me with the same
subject adds the reference to our discussion into the changelog.
On 02/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> rather than wake_up_all(). This way do_notify_pidfd() won't wakeup the
> POLLHUP-only waiters which wait for pid_task() == NULL.
>
> TODO:
> - as Christian pointed out, this asks for the new wake_up_all_poll()
> helper, it can already have other users.
>
> - we can probably discriminate the PIDFD_THREAD and non-PIDFD_THREAD
> waiters, but this needs more work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 9b40109f0c56..c3fac06937e2 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -2021,11 +2021,12 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type)
>
> void do_notify_pidfd(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> - struct pid *pid;
> + struct pid *pid = task_pid(task);
>
> WARN_ON(task->exit_state == 0);
> - pid = task_pid(task);
> - wake_up_all(&pid->wait_pidfd);
> +
> + __wake_up(&pid->wait_pidfd, TASK_NORMAL, 0,
> + poll_to_key(EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM));
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists