lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcF3qmion7H6qyYY@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 14:04:58 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Cestmir Kalina <ckalina@...hat.com>,
	Alex Gladkov <agladkov@...hat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
	Costa Shulyupin <cshulyup@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-wq v3 0/4] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on
 ordered workqueues

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 09:53:09AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:45:58PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> >  v3:
> >   - [v2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240203154334.791910-1-longman@redhat.com/
> >   - Drop patch 1 as it has been merged into the for-6.9 branch.
> >   - Use rcu_access_pointer() to access wq->dfl_pwq.
> >   - Use RCU protection instead of acquiring wq->mutex in
> >     apply_wqattrs_cleanup().
> 
> Looks like we raced each other. I'll wait for v4.

BTW, please don't bother to handle __WQ_ORDERED being cleared. We are very
close to removing the implicit ORDERED promotion, so we should be able to
apply the patch to remove the distinction between explicitly and implicitly
ordered workqueues.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ