lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 07:53:11 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the block tree

On 2/6/24 6:42 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:12 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:11 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>>>
>>> In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/bits.h:6,
>>>                  from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/bitops.h:6,
>>>                  from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/kernel.h:23,
>>>                  from /home/sfr/next/next/io_uring/nop.c:2:
>>> /home/sfr/next/next/include/vdso/bits.h:7:40: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
>>>     7 | #define BIT(nr)                 (UL(1) << (nr))
>>>       |                                        ^~
>>> /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/io_uring_types.h:538:35: note: in expansion of macro 'BIT'
>>>   538 |         REQ_F_CAN_POLL          = BIT(REQ_F_CAN_POLL_BIT),
>>>       |                                   ^~~
>>>
>>> (and mny more similar)
>>>
>>> Introduced by commit
>>>
>>>   d964e8440442 ("io_uring: add io_file_can_poll() helper")
>>>
>>> REQ_F_CAN_POLL_BIT is 32.
>>
>> All of these BIT() have to be changed to BIT_ULL().
>> And let's hope all variables used for storing these flags have been
>> changed from unsigned long to u64...
> 
> I have sent a fix
> https://lore.kernel.org/1960190f37b94276df50d382b9f1488cd6b6e662.1707226862.git.geert+renesas@glider.be

It needs a bit more than that, just because there's one helper that
also returns flags to be set. I've sorted it out and amended the commit,
should be fine now. I'll check on 32-bit as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ