lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:20:54 +0000
From: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
To: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Dai <davidai@...gle.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] uclamp sum aggregation

On 02/01/24 13:11, Hongyan Xia wrote:

> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331014356.1033759-1-davidai@google.com/

Their solution is not acceptable for the same reason yours isn't. Saravana and
David know this and we discussed at LPC. uclamp hints are limits and should not
be summed.

> [2]: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/gs/+/refs/heads/android-gs-raviole-5.10-android12-d1/drivers/soc/google/vh/kernel/sched/fair.c#510

I think I clarified several times so far that this is not related to uclamp.
Could you please refrain from referring to it again in the future? This is
misleading and neither helps your cause nor its cause. The fact that you're
relating to it makes me very worried as both links demonstrate lack of
understanding/confusion of what uclamp is supposed to be.

Again, this solution is not acceptable and you're moving things in the wrong
direction. We don't want to redesign what uclamp means, but fix some corner
cases. And you're doing the former not the latter.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ